I was flipping through old editions of
Beijing Review, a top Chinese
foreign policy weekly that is published in English, with the intent
of showing the world what Chinese analysts, policy makers, and other
people of note have to say about the issues facing China and the
world around the globe. I was thumbing through the 2001 issues, and
as I approached September, I felt a sinking feeling in my stomach.
With each issue that I read, I became more and more anxious to read
the September 20 issue, the first issue published after the attacks
on September 11 (the issues are published for the coming week, so the
September 13 issue was written prior to the attacks.)
I grew
up in the suburbs of New York. Most of the kids that I went to school
with had parents that worked in the city, including myself. Many of
our parents, including my father, dealt in finance, working for the
big banks, hedge funds, trading companies, and other firms that take
up much of the real estate of Manhattan's downtown area. Many of my
classmates' parents worked in the World Trade Center.
I
remember that Tuesday morning very clearly. I was in my fourth grade
class, and our teacher told us that we had to sit for a special
assembly. Some of our teachers explained what happened-- three
airplanes had crashed, two into the World Trade Center towers, and
one into the Pentagon. Even as fourth graders, we were stunned. One
child, Cory, asked if this was “something they tell the fourth
graders every year.” Cory's dad worked on an upper floor of the
World Trade Center. He survived, but the terror that Cory and his
mother must have faced in the hours before they knew that (cell phone
service around the tri-state area was knocked out that day, and the
evacuations that kept people from their work phones left many of us
in the dark as to whether or not our loved ones were still alive.)
That
day was not as traumatizing for me as it was for others around me. By
11pm, my own father, who was on the train into the city when the
first plane hit, had managed to find a way home on a day when the
normal parts of life, like cell phones, subways, and commuter trains
had vanished, managed to find a way home. Nobody that I was close to
was dead. One of my close friend's fathers was dealt a major
laceration on his shoulder, but he recovered over the following
weeks.
Still,
the mention of the words “September 11” still conjure up vivid
memories and emotions for me and for hundreds of millions of
Americans around me. A vast majority of Americans can still recall
what they were doing that day and how they were impacted by the day's
events. Friends of mine who live in the city can recall watching the
towers fall out of their windows. A friend who grew up on the lower
west side remembers the choking dust clouds that encompassed the
area. Some of these friends-- none of whom lost any family that day--
still choke up with tears when asked to recall their memories of that
day. To many Americans, and especially those of us who had skin in
the game that day, September 11 may have been the single most
important day of our lives. There is not one person around you whose
world view has not been shaped by everything that occurred that day.
Twelve years on, as the anniversary of September 11 becomes less and
less important in time, with President Bush, Mayor Giuliani, and
Governor Pataki out of office, with the new World Trade Center
soaring above New York and with Osama Bin Laden's dead body
decomposing in the Indian Ocean, September 11 2001 remains the
unequivocal single most important date in the new millennium.
It was
with all of this in mind that I opened up the September 20, 2001
issue of the Beijing Review
expecting to find an issue completely devoted to the attacks. Almost
all other foreign policy publications worldwide had dropped their
normal coverage to devote nearly their entire issues to the attacks.
The September
15, 2001 issue of The Economist
, which usually devoted about 10-15% of its space to issues facing
the United States, turned nearly the entire magazine into a series of
reports about September 11, and it was not nearly alone.
Opening
up Beijing Review though,
I saw that the attacks of September 11
warranted no more than three pages of writing, and did not even
manage to make it as the cover story.
I was
shocked. Enraged. Confused. I felt almost violated. It was as if the
Beijing Review had
slapped me across the face. It just made no sense to me how a major
foreign policy journal, especially one written in English, could
continue on with their normal publishing format, as if the attacks of
September 11 were just a normal part of life. Didn't they understand
that this was the biggest event of the 21st
century? Didn't they understand that this changed everything? Did it
matter to them that the collective conscious of 300 million Americans
was traumatized by the sight of our towers collapsing?
It
turns out that they did. They were able to articulate all of these
concerns. They wrote about a nation being shocked out of its peaceful
slumber. They wrote about the geopolitical changes that would
undoubtedly occur as a response to these attacks. They wrote about
all of this. They just didn't care as much. The story wasn't front
and center. It didn't consume their lives in the way it consumed
ours.
The
scope of this class is to define what it means to be a human being,
but one thing that we can touch more on is what it means to belong to
a human community. There are seven billion people on this planet, and
we can't expect the issues that concern some of us to concern all of
us. If I was emotionally traumatized every time I heard a story about
a rape, murder, war crimes, natural disasters, or any of the other
acts of violence or other types of chaos and destruction, I would be
in a psych ward by now. It is impossible to feel empathy for
everyone. We must be concerned for our own lives, and cannot allow
the issues that other people face to dictate our own emotional well
being. The fact is that some degree of selfishness is good for us.
While
I fully expect the Beijing Review
to focus on issues that relate more to Chinese concerns, the fact of
the matter is that the publishers, writers, editors, and sponsors of
that publication belong to a global community. Their own response to
the attacks on September 11 raise important questions.
How
much can we really be expected to respond to the trauma that afflicts
the lives of people around the globe? Why do we expect an event like
September 11 to resonate in hearts and minds around the world, while
we forget that areas like the Congo, North Korea, Chechnya, and the
horn of Africa face daily violence that surpasses September 11 in the
scale of how much it affects their populations. The tsunami that hit
southeast Asia in 2004 killed over 200,000 people and displaced
millions more, yet I do not spend my days thinking of all of the ways
in which it changed my life.
How
much can I really call myself an enlightened member of the human
community when September 11 stands out to me in a way that these
horrors do not even come close to? How can I chastise a Chinese
publication for not putting emphasis on September 11 when I can say
with certainty that I would not put similar emphasis on the 2008
Sichuan earthquake that killed nearly 70,000 and left millions
homeless. The wars in the Congo that have killed millions of people
over the last two decades simply do not resonate in my mind as I go
about my day, unless I make a special effort to think about that part
of the world.
While
some selectivity is undoubtedly a good thing, we must remember that
we are members of a global community. The billions of people who we
ignore have a right to ignore us as well. When I think about my own
shock at seeing a Chinese journal's lack of coverage of September 11
I must ask myself, how many events that are equal to or greater than
September 11 in the minds of those who experience it am I missing out
on?
I pose
a series of questions to anyone who managed to read this far: What
does it mean to you to be part of a global community? Does a global
community even really exist? Which is more important to you, the
seven billion total humans, or the much smaller number of people that
exist in your country, state, city, town, school, or home?
I think that as humans, we categorize everything and feel the need to give a definition to everything. We desperately, and vainly, search for what makes us human, what makes us male or female, what makes us American. We cling to events such as 9/11 because they bring us closer as a community. Yet one event in history cannot define a community.
ReplyDeleteI am a dual citizen with South Africa and the United States, having been born in South Africa and living there until I was 10. My family was in Washington, DC on 9/11, as my dad was on sabbatical. I must honestly say that, even though I am an American citizen, I feel no connection to the 9/11 attacks. However, as I am part of a global community, I understand the consequences of the attacks; families being ripped apart, citizens distressed about their safety, the use of the attacks in US foreign policy.
Recently, Nelson Mandela passed away. Suddenly, the entire world was looking towards South Africa. Honestly, the last time there was this much attention on the country was the World Cup back in 2010. For a moment, the world reflected upon the life of this truly remarkable leader, and the world showed interest in such a young country that overcame a horrendous past. Then that moment passed, and American’s went back to obsessing over Obamacare or the 2016 elections. There were no discussions over the current state of the South African government, that the Nkandla scandal could result in the South African President being brought to trial for corruption (after already being on trial for rape). There were no discussions about the country’s rape, homicide, or AIDS statistics, or even more encouraging reports showcasing the incredible new art, fashion, and music coming out of South Africa.
How can we expect everyone in the world to see 9/11 as we in America do? Remember Kony 2012? Suddenly, half of America was geared up, once again, to ‘help Africa’. After donating a few dollars and receiving super awesome wristbands, most people forgot about Kony, similar to how we do not dwell on the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia (230,210 – 280,000 deaths), the 2011 tsunami in Japan (15,883 deaths), or even the 2010 earthquakes in Haiti and China (which resulted in a combined 318,000 deaths). People blame the media for our fleeting interest in international human rights stories; that the 24 hour news cycle distracts us and limits our attention. But I think that it really comes down total apathy concerning events that do not immediately affect us.
We are far to consumed with defining what is immediate to us. Can we, as humans, relate to someone who is 10,000 miles away from us? Can we merely relate to and take comfort in the idea of a global community because we see ourselves as human, even when there is no real consensus on what it means to be human?